Review Process

The International Journal of Embryo Cryobiology and Reproductive Sciences follows a structured peer review process designed to evaluate the quality, originality, scientific validity, and relevance of submitted manuscripts. The process aims to provide authors with fair, constructive, and timely feedback while maintaining confidentiality and research integrity.

1. Manuscript Submission

Authors submit their manuscripts through the journal's online submission system. The manuscript should follow the journal's author guidelines and include all required information and supporting materials.

2. Initial Editorial Screening

After submission, the editorial team conducts an initial assessment to determine whether the manuscript:

  • Fits the aims and scope of the journal.
  • Meets basic formatting and submission requirements.
  • Contains sufficient scholarly and scientific content.
  • Follows applicable ethical requirements.
  • Meets originality and publication standards.

Manuscripts that do not meet basic requirements may be returned to the authors for correction or may not proceed to peer review.

3. Reviewer Selection

Manuscripts suitable for review may be assigned to qualified reviewers with appropriate expertise in the subject area.

Reviewer selection may consider:

  • Subject expertise.
  • Research experience.
  • Academic qualifications.
  • Absence of conflicts of interest.
  • Availability to complete the review.

4. Peer Review

Reviewers independently evaluate the manuscript and provide comments to the editorial team.

The review may consider:

  • Originality and significance.
  • Scientific methodology.
  • Research design.
  • Data quality and analysis.
  • Accuracy of interpretation.
  • Relevance of conclusions.
  • Ethical considerations.
  • Quality of references.
  • Clarity and organization of the manuscript.

5. Reviewer Comments

Reviewers are expected to provide constructive and professional feedback. They may identify major or minor issues and suggest improvements that could strengthen the manuscript.

Reviewer comments are considered by the editor when making an editorial decision.

6. Editorial Decision

Based on the editorial assessment and reviewer reports, the manuscript may receive a decision such as:

  • Accept
  • Minor Revision
  • Major Revision
  • Reject

The final decision is made by the editorial team based on the overall quality, relevance, and integrity of the manuscript.

7. Revision Process

When revisions are requested, authors should carefully address the reviewer and editorial comments.

Authors should:

  • Provide a revised manuscript.
  • Clearly address each significant reviewer comment.
  • Explain any changes made.
  • Provide a reasoned response when a suggested change is not adopted.

A revised manuscript may be returned to the original reviewers for further evaluation when necessary.

8. Confidentiality

Manuscripts and reviewer reports are treated as confidential during the review process.

Reviewers and editorial team members should not disclose unpublished manuscript information or use it for personal or professional purposes.